Home Home Home About Us Home About Us About Us About Us /links/index.html /links/index.html /links/index.html /advertising/index.html /links/index.html /advertising/index.html /advertising/index.html /advertising/index.html About Us About Us /archives/index.html About Us /archives/index.html About Us /archives/index.html /archives/index.html /subscribe/index.html /archives/index.html /subscribe/index.html /archives/index.html /subscribe/index.html /subscribe/index.html /survey/index.html /subscribe/index.html /survey/index.html /subscribe/index.html /survey/index.html /survey/index.html /survey/index.html /links/index.html /survey/index.html /links/index.html /links/index.html /links/index.html
HomeAbout UsAbout Us/links/index.html/advertising/index.html/advertising/index.html
About Us/archives/index.html/archives/index.html/subscribe/index.html/subscribe/index.html/survey/index.html/survey/index.html/survey/index.html/links/index.html

Cover Story
Spotlight On Schools
Featured Columnists
Letters
Books
Business of Education
Careers
Children's Corner
Colleges & Grad Schools
Commentary
Continuing Education
Editorials
Languages
Law & Education
MEDICAL UPDATE
MetroBEAT
Movies & Theater
Museums
Music, Art & Dance
Politics In Education
Special Education
Sports & Camps
Technology in Education
Travel
1995-2000
2001
2002
   
 
New York City
November 2002

Putting Democracy in the People’s Hands
By Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg

When I appointed a Commission to study changes to the City’s Charter, I suggested they propose amending the line of mayoral succession, so that the Deputy Mayor would serve as Acting Mayor for a limited period of time if the Mayor dies while in office or has to leave office prematurely. The Commission considered it, and ultimately, they decided to place a different issue on this year’s ballot: holding a special election in sixty days if there’s a vacancy in the mayoralty, but leaving the line of succession as it is. I think it makes a lot of sense. Here’s why:

If something happens to the Mayor, the voters should be able to choose are placement as quickly as possible. That’s what democracy is all about. And by requiring a special election to be held sixty days after a vacancy occurs, the proposed change to the Charter would put the business of choosing a new Mayor exactly where it belongs: in the people’s hands.

Currently, if the Mayor dies while in office or leaves prematurely, the voters may have to wait up to fifteen months until they can elect a new Mayor. By any standard, fifteen months is a long time. In a city as fast-paced as ours, it’s a lifetime. With an unelected Mayor at the helm, government operations could suffer, long-term planning could come to a standstill, and a climate of uncertainty would likely prevail. “In an ever-changing world where cities compete on a daily basis for jobs, tourists and businesses, the costs of having an unelected Mayor in office for up to fifteen months could be crippling.

At its core, our democracy works better when we fill vacancies through elections, rather than through unelected, long-term interim successors.

That’s why the City’s Charter already mandates that vacancies in every other City office–from the City Council to the Comptroller–be filled by special elections. That reasoning applies to the Office of Mayor more than anywhere else, and it’s exactly what the proposed change to the City’s Charter would accomplish.

When you head into the voting booth on November 5, please don’t forget that this important proposal–one that puts our City’s future in your hands–is on the ballot. However you choose to vote, by weighing in on charter reform, you’ll reinforce what this proposal is all about: letting the people decide.#

Name:-
E-mail:
City: State:
Comments:

Education Update, Inc., P.O. Box 20005, New York, NY 10001.
Tel: (212) 481-5519. Fax: (212) 481-3919.Email: ednews1@aol.com.
All material is copyrighted and may not be printed without express consent of the publisher. © 2002.


MetroBEAT
DIRECTORIES