Home Home Home About Us Home About Us About Us About Us /links/index.html /links/index.html /links/index.html /advertising/index.html /links/index.html /advertising/index.html /advertising/index.html /advertising/index.html About Us About Us /archives/index.html About Us /archives/index.html About Us /archives/index.html /archives/index.html /subscribe/index.html /archives/index.html /subscribe/index.html /archives/index.html /subscribe/index.html /subscribe/index.html /survey/index.html /subscribe/index.html /survey/index.html /subscribe/index.html /survey/index.html /survey/index.html /survey/index.html /links/index.html /survey/index.html /links/index.html /links/index.html /links/index.html
HomeAbout UsAbout Us/links/index.html/advertising/index.html/advertising/index.html
About Us/archives/index.html/archives/index.html/subscribe/index.html/subscribe/index.html/survey/index.html/survey/index.html/survey/index.html/links/index.html

Cover Story
Spotlight On Schools
Featured Columnists
Letters
Books
Business of Education
Careers
Children's Corner
Colleges & Grad Schools
Commentary
Continuing Education
Editorials
Languages
Law & Education
MEDICAL UPDATE
MetroBEAT
Movies & Theater
Museums
Music, Art & Dance
Politics In Education
Special Education
Sports & Camps
Technology in Education
Travel
1995-2000
2001
2002
   
 
New York City
August 2002

A Tale of Two Obstacles
By Jill S. Levy

These are certainly not the best of times for New York City public schools. They may turn out to be the worst of times, but for New York City school principals it is not “the age of wisdom.” For too many of our children, our schools are simply a welfare state, dependent upon the kindness of others. For some it boils down to a legal issue. For educators it is a matter of intellect and commitment.

For NYC principals, there are two obstacles they must face–the budget and standards. On the one hand, principals have been addressing the challenge of educating students to ever higher standards that have been set by the New York State Regents. On the other hand, they have been handed a decision by the Appellate Court in the Campaign for Fiscal Equity lawsuit asserting that a sound basic education including “basic literacy, calculating, and verbal skills” is sufficient for students to eventually serve on juries and vote. As for employment, the court held that education that provided for the “lowest level of service jobs” was sufficient. The question is whether the NYS per pupil funding for NYC students, which is lower than the rest of the state, will support even the abysmally low standards endorsed by the Appellate Court ruling. In addition, according to an independent budget report, NYC school funding has not even kept pace with the increased cost of living.

What is clear is that, as principals and their assistant principals lead their faculties in providing the educational opportunities for their students to meet the higher Regents’ standards, there are draconian cuts on the horizon. Not only are we about to lose significant educational resources like smaller class size, libraries, art and music but we are about to lose an incredible number of human resources in each school. With nearly one-third of our schools losing principals and assistant principals (many of whom will not be replaced) and an exodus of our most accomplished teachers, we are about to embark on a very difficult course.

With a naive sense of what the principal’s job really requires, inexperienced teachers will jump into principal positions with little chance of success. Our children cannot afford to be caught in this revolving door through which principals and teachers come and go.

In spite of the lack of adequate funding and in spite of the argument over standards, NYC principals are committed to educational excellence. In a recent survey they told us that their number one reason for becoming a principal was to have a positive educational impact on students and faculties. They are, in fact, charged with maintaining the highest Regents’ standards. Their professional standing depends upon how well their schools meet those standards and principals will be evaluated accordingly. To his credit, Mayor Bloomberg has accepted the challenge of improving public education at a time when the political, judicial and fiscal sands are shifting. The stakes are high for our children, our principals, and our city.

The truth of the matter is that the Appellate Court may not be entirely off the mark. Justice Lerner asserts that depressed test scores are related to demographic conditions and suggests that we spend more on addressing underlying social conditions. But, like education, reversing poor social conditions takes time and resources. The children who are in our NYC public schools right now cannot wait for us to eradicate the social ills; they want an education today that is as rich as that of their suburban counterparts. It is not a question of “either/or”. We need adequate and equitable resources to address educational and social needs simultaneously. I hope this mayor and governor will help reset this course because we cannot rely too heavily on the courts; they have a way of shifting with the political wind.#

Jill Levy is the President of the Council of Supervisors and Administrators (CSA).

 

Name:
E-mail:
Comments:

Education Update, Inc., P.O. Box 20005, New York, NY 10001.
Tel: (212) 481-5519. Fax: (212) 481-3919.Email: ednews1@aol.com.
All material is copyrighted and may not be printed without express consent of the publisher. © 2002.


SPOTLIGHT ON SCHOOLS
DIRECTORIES