Home About Us Media Kit Subscriptions Links Forum
APPEARED IN


View All Articles

Download PDF

FAMOUS INTERVIEWS

Directories:

SCHOLARSHIPS & GRANTS

HELP WANTED

Tutors

Workshops

Events

Sections:

Books

Camps & Sports

Careers

Children’s Corner

Collected Features

Colleges

Cover Stories

Distance Learning

Editorials

Famous Interviews

Homeschooling

Medical Update

Metro Beat

Movies & Theater

Museums

Music, Art & Dance

Special Education

Spotlight On Schools

Teachers of the Month

Technology

Archives:

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

1995-2000


JUNE 2007

Guest Editorial:
Reflections on the Current State of Education in America

By Chancellor Matthew Goldstein, The City University of New York

When I reflect on the current state of education in our country today, I see a very alarming trend: I see fewer students enrolling and succeeding in the disciplines of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). I have a few thoughts about why this is happening, and how we might address it.

I believe that too few students are enticed early enough by the beauties of physical and mathematical phenomena. Too many are “scared off” by the accurate perception that these disciplines are difficult. We are not sufficiently engaging America’s young people in these studies and preparing them for the advanced learning and accomplishment that our nation requires for our future economic health and security.

Perhaps you saw Thomas Friedman’s recent editorial in The New York Times. In that column, Mr. Friedman described his experience attending this year’s Commencement at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. “For a moment,” he wrote, “as the foreign names kept coming…I thought that the entire class of doctoral students in physics were going to be Chinese….” Friedman warned that “we can’t keep being stupid about these things. You can’t have a world where foreign-born students dominate your science graduate schools, research labs, journal publications and can now more easily than ever go back to their home countries to start companies—without it eventually impacting our standard of living….”

So we simply must get more of our students hooked on these fields. Early. 

I suggest that we all think about some new work, work that was in fact recently highlighted in Education Update, from the eminent psychologist Howard Gardner. In his new book Five Minds for the Future, Dr. Gardner poses a big question: What minds should we be cultivating in our young people, what kinds of minds will they need if they (and our society) “are to thrive in the world during the eras to come”?

I am struck by his formulation of five mind “types”: the disciplined mind, the synthesizing mind, the creating mind, the respectful mind, and the ethical mind. Of course, all these minds need cultivating; I certainly hope that on the postsecondary level, we’re doing exactly that work at CUNY. But when I think of the discouraging trend I’ve just cited, two of Dr. Gardner’s “minds” assume added importance: the disciplined mind, and the creating one.

A disciplined mind learns the ways of thinking that we associate with the major disciplines (Dr. Gardner singles out mathematics, science, history, and “at least one art form”). And a disciplined mind, Dr. Gardner suggests, is an active and creative one:  “Once one has understood well a particular play, a particular war, a particular physical or biological or managerial concept, the appetite has been whetted for additional and deeper understanding, and for clear-cut performances in which one’s understanding can be demonstrated to others and to oneself. Indeed, the genuine understander is unlikely in the future to accept only superficial understandings. Rather, having eaten from the tree of understanding, he or she is likely to return there repeatedly for ever more satisfying intellectual nourishment.”

This vital intellectual curiosity establishes a bridge to the “creating mind” that seeks new work, new standards, new questions, new answers. The creating mind is a mind like that of Albert Einstein, whose success as a theorist, as Walter Isaacson has observed in a new biography, “came not from the brute strength of his mental processing power but from his imagination and creativity.”

We need young Americans to “have it all”: They need the disciplinary knowledge associated with mathematics and the sciences, and they need the imagination and creativity too often missing from rote learning. It’s a lot to ask of those responsible for teaching them, but it simply must be done.#

COMMENT ON THIS ARTICLE

Name:

Email:
Show email
City:
State:

 


 

 

 

Education Update, Inc.
All material is copyrighted and may not be printed without express consent of the publisher. © 2009.