Home About Us Media Kit Subscriptions Links Forum
APPEARED IN


View All Articles

Download PDF

FAMOUS INTERVIEWS

Directories:

SCHOLARSHIPS & GRANTS

HELP WANTED

Tutors

Workshops

Events

Sections:

Books

Camps & Sports

Careers

Children’s Corner

Collected Features

Colleges

Cover Stories

Distance Learning

Editorials

Famous Interviews

Homeschooling

Medical Update

Metro Beat

Movies & Theater

Museums

Music, Art & Dance

Special Education

Spotlight On Schools

Teachers of the Month

Technology

Archives:

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

1995-2000


DECEMBER 2007

TEACHERS COLLEGE CONFERENCE ON EDUCATIONAL EQUITY

The Future of School Desegregation & Affirmative Action: Analysis of Seattle & Louisville U.S. Supreme Court Ruling

By Richard Kagan

This morning panel kicked off the two day Symposium “Equal Educational Opportunity: What Now?” Panelists included Ted Shaw, President and Director-Counsel, NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, john a. powell, Executive Director, Kirwin Institute for Race Ethnicity, Ohio State University, and James Ryan, Professor of Law, University of Virginia Law School. The panel was moderated by Dr. Amy Stuart Wells, Professor of Sociology and Education, Teachers College, Columbia University.

This past summer, the Supreme Court handed down a 5-4 decision, to overturn Seattle and Louisville’s plan of voluntary school desegregation. At the same time, a different majority of the court indicated that other voluntary integration plans which do not assign individual students by race, but which rely on mechanisms, like magnet school, re-drawing of attendance zones, strategic site selection of new school, allocated resources for special programs, recruitment of students and faculty in a targeted fashion, and tracking enrollments, performance, and other statistics by race are permissible. Justice Kennedy was the swing vote in his concurring opinion.

Mr. Shaw, a legal expert in the continuing struggle for civil rights for people of color, conveyed his disappointment in the Supreme Court decision and said that in essence, the court has turned its back on the landmark Brown v. Board of Education case. He said there is a need for political pressure and called the challenge before the nation, “daunting and depressing.” Shaw said that if the issue of school segregation can’t be solved by both whites and blacks together, the nation as a whole, will suffer.

john powell of Ohio State University, had a more positive outlook on this case. He admits the court seems conflicted, that Kennedy isn’t clear on what the decision means. He himself admits he doesn’t know what it means. powell states that this case is a very complicated and confused opinion. And, precisely because of this, he sees a place for “potential movement.” Kennedy is telling us there is something that we can do. powell states that this issue is not over; he said that 95 percent of the people in the U.S. say they support having integrated schools. powell notes an “Implementation Gap”, saying people agree to do something, but they don’t want to make the effort and that applies to integration in schools today. Progress can be made, but we, as a nation, need to be clear about what we want. powell refers to the work of Thomas Jefferson who noted that education is the bedrock of democracy. This is the goal that we need to work toward, that everyone, regardless of color, have equal access to education.

COMMENT ON THIS ARTICLE

Name:

Email:
Show email
City:
State:

 


 

 

 

Education Update, Inc.
All material is copyrighted and may not be printed without express consent of the publisher. © 2009.